A kinematic and electromyographic comparison of a Grammont‑style reverse arthroplasty combined with a l’Episcopo transfer compared to a lateralized humeral component reverse for restoration of active external rotation

A kinematic and electromyographic comparison of a Grammont‑style reverse arthroplasty combined with a l’Episcopo transfer compared to a lateralized humeral component reverse for restoration of active external rotation

To assess kinematic and electromyographic findings of two designs of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).

We tested two hypotheses: (H1) Grammont-style (RTSA) with l’Episcopo tendon transfer gains similar postoperative kinematic findings of a lateralized humeral component RTSA without a tendon transfer; (H2) RTSA with lateralized humeral component induces earlier shoulder muscle activation during shoulder motion compared with standard Grammont prosthesis with l’Episcopo transfer.